![]() ![]() can't do anything without them!)Īt some point we'd set a release date, and maybe build up some hype with marketing and PR pushes.So, here’s my list of the best free and paid Harmonica VST plugins that are currently available. (A beta team usually helps with this testing, as well as creating demos. We'd determine the scope of the virtual instrument-what articulations it has, how deeply it is sampled (mics, round robins, dynamic layers, etc.)-and then preparations are made: hiring musicians and engineers, reserving studio time, creating the scores, etc.Īfter the recording sessions are done, we'll intake the audio, do a NR pass, cut and normalize (and potentially process and/or tune-up) the samples depending on the needs of the instrument(s) we're making, name them all, and then place them into the engine (usually Kontakt) and work on tweaking the script, UI/UX, and certain value parameters until the library 'feels' correct. Most of the time we'll either have something in mind that we'd like to have as composers ourselves, or see a clear hole in the market that we'd be particularly well-suited to fill. Here's how it generally goes in any of the companies I've done work for: My guess is that if you do find a virtual pipe you like, it will be some sort of Uilleann. Much easier to control and to mix with other instruments in the room and on the desk. were Scottish (and thus, as the movie even showed, would be using the Great Highland ). This is, incidentally, why James Horner went with the Uilleann as the key pipe sound for Braveheart, even though it's an Irish pipe and William Wallace & co. It's the ante-in, the bare minimum, the sine qua non, but all of the above has to happen on top of the initial cost outlay. In short, pipes are one of the hardest and most expensive instruments to really 'get right'-in any step in the production process-in the sampling world, which is why you'll probably be severely underwhelmed by anything that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.and even then it is a maybe and not a guarantee that the expensive option is even that much better. Preserving the intonation (and subsequent sympathetic resonation) of the instruments while also making them playable in even ONE key that plays nicely with other instruments, much less making them chromatically-accessible, is a giant headache! Most bagpipes are not just not chromatic, but their sense of tuning differs from the common A440/12TET that make virtual instruments easy to use.Having these intelligently happen in the right places and sounding correctly is a logistical and scripting challenge. Furthermore to point 3, because the sound is continuous, various piping traditions have established a number of ornamental figures to provide separation and relative energy/importance to notes.There are drones and a chanter-the sound is continuous, polyphonic, and multifaceted-and this presents some serious complications when scripting virtual performance possibilities and workflows.(And this, not to mention the correct relative microphone placement!) Capturing the fullness of that sound accurately indoors requires, at the least, a huge room with good (and, moreover, appropriate) acoustics, which is not cheap to come by. Perhaps not so much for the Uilleann pipes, but most bagpipes are traditionally LOUD, outdoor instruments.Bagpipes are a relatively uncommon instrument, so finding pro-level players to sample is harder than, say, finding a clarinetist or violinist.Speaking as someone who makes virtual instruments for a living, the main issues here are: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |